Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8063036

Cosmetics: The recompile log produces double lines for some reason

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: P5
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 8u40
    • Fix Version/s: 9
    • Component/s: core-libs
    • Labels:
    • Subcomponent:
    • Resolved In Build:
      b40
    • CPU:
      generic
    • OS:
      generic

      Backports

        Description

        Running nashorn with --log=recompile (at info level) already unnecessarily verbose. Now we also get log of the form

        [recompile] Parameter type specialization of 'L:752$Finally$Finally' signature: (Object,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Looking up 'L:752$Finally$Finally' type=(ScriptFunction,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Looking up 'L:752$Finally$Finally' type=(ScriptFunction,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Parameter type specialization of 'L:752$TryFinally$TryFinally' signature: (Object,Object,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Looking up 'L:752$TryFinally$TryFinally' type=(ScriptFunction,Object,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Looking up 'L:752$TryFinally$TryFinally' type=(ScriptFunction,Object,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Parameter type specialization of 'L:6526$Parser$parseObjectType' signature: (Object,Object,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Looking up 'L:6526$Parser$parseObjectType' type=(ScriptFunction,Object,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Looking up 'L:6526$Parser$parseObjectType' type=(ScriptFunction,Object,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Parameter type specialization of 'L:752$Label$Label' signature: (Object,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Looking up 'L:752$Label$Label' type=(ScriptFunction,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Looking up 'L:752$Label$Label' type=(ScriptFunction,Object,Object)Object
        [recompile] Parameter type specialization of 'L:752$LabeledStatement$LabeledStatement' signature: (Object,Object,Object,Object)Obje


        Which seems redundant. Just eyeballing the code doesn't tell me why this is so.

          Attachments

            Issue Links

              Activity

                People

                • Assignee:
                  lagergren Marcus Lagergren
                  Reporter:
                  lagergren Marcus Lagergren
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  2 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved: