From Kevin R,
I found a couple missing or mistyped @param tags for our generic types. Would you expect javadoc to flag the following?
1. A missing '@param <T>' tag for a "public class Foo<T>"
2. A mistyped '@param T' tag instead of '@param <T>' for a "public class Foo<T>"
I found a couple missing or mistyped @param tags for our generic types. Would you expect javadoc to flag the following?
1. A missing '@param <T>' tag for a "public class Foo<T>"
2. A mistyped '@param T' tag instead of '@param <T>' for a "public class Foo<T>"