Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8180410

ByteArrayOutputStream should not throw IOExceptions

    Details

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: P4
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 8, 9
    • Fix Version/s: 11
    • Component/s: core-libs
    • Subcomponent:
    • Resolved In Build:
      b07

      Description

      A DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST :
       

          ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream(128);
          baos.write(123); // does NOT have a throws-exception clause
          try
          {
            baos.write("Hello world".getBytes()); // HAS a throws-exception clause
          }
          catch (IOException e)
          {
            // even though it never happens
          }

      JUSTIFICATION :
      It's contradictive.
      And it's easy to solve, without impact.

      EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
      EXPECTED -
      The ByteArrayOutputStream class should extend the OutputStream#write(byte[]) method and remove the exception clause:

          @Override
          public void write(byte b[]) // no more exception here.
          {
            try { super.write(b); } catch(IOException ioe) {}
          }
      ACTUAL -
      Right now, you just always have to make an empty catch-block whenever you use this write(byte[]) method.

          ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
          try
          {
            baos.write(byteArray);
          }
          catch (IOException ioe)
          {
            // never happens
          }

      ---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
          ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
          try
          {
            baos.write(byteArray);
          }
          catch (IOException ioe)
          {
            // never happens
          }
      ---------- END SOURCE ----------

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                bpb Brian Burkhalter
                Reporter:
                webbuggrp Webbug Group
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                7 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: