Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8256359

AArch64: runtime/ReservedStack/ReservedStackTestCompiler.java fails

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Subcomponent:
    • Resolved In Build:
      b27
    • CPU:
      aarch64
    • OS:
      linux
    • Verification:
      Verified

      Backports

        Description

        The following test failed in the JDK16 CI:

        runtime/ReservedStack/ReservedStackTestCompiler.java

        Here's a snippet from the log file:

        #section:main
        ----------messages:(5/622)----------
        command: main -XX:-TieredCompilation -XX:-Inline -XX:CompileCommand=exclude,java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractOwnableSynchronizer.setExclusiveOwnerThread ReservedStackTest
        reason: User specified action: run main/othervm -XX:-TieredCompilation -XX:-Inline -XX:CompileCommand=exclude,java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractOwnableSynchronizer.setExclusiveOwnerThread ReservedStackTest
        Mode: othervm [/othervm specified]
        Additional options from @modules: --add-modules java.base --add-exports java.base/jdk.internal.misc=ALL-UNNAMED --add-exports java.base/jdk.internal.vm.annotation=ALL-UNNAMED
        elapsed time (seconds): 16.907
        ----------configuration:(5/193)----------
        Boot Layer
          add modules: java.base
          add exports: java.base/jdk.internal.misc ALL-UNNAMED
                       java.base/jdk.internal.vm.annotation ALL-UNNAMED

        ----------System.out:(62/3935)----------
        CompileCommand: exclude java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractOwnableSynchronizer.setExclusiveOwnerThread
        Command line: [/scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/jib-master/install/jdk-16+25-1586/linux-aarch64-debug.jdk/jdk-16/fastdebug/bin/java -cp /scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/slaves/47535081-0322-4d83-bb78-f7e11abb86d0-S47885/frameworks/1735e8a2-a1db-478c-8104-60c8b0af87dd-0196/executors/2d9383f7-be9a-46ca-bd9e-a682713fb404/runs/711ce683-d382-44e6-9de8-416483e6778b/testoutput/test-support/jtreg_open_test_hotspot_jtreg_hotspot_tier2_runtime/classes/0/runtime/ReservedStack/ReservedStackTestCompiler.d:/scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/jib-master/install/jdk-16+25-1586/src.full/open/test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/ReservedStack:/scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/slaves/47535081-0322-4d83-bb78-f7e11abb86d0-S47885/frameworks/1735e8a2-a1db-478c-8104-60c8b0af87dd-0196/executors/2d9383f7-be9a-46ca-bd9e-a682713fb404/runs/711ce683-d382-44e6-9de8-416483e6778b/testoutput/test-support/jtreg_open_test_hotspot_jtreg_hotspot_tier2_runtime/classes/0/test/lib:/scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/jib-master/install/jdk-16+25-1586/src.full/open/test/lib:/scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/jib-master/install/jtreg/5.1/b01/bundles/jtreg_bin-5.1.zip/jtreg/lib/javatest.jar:/scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/jib-master/install/jtreg/5.1/b01/bundles/jtreg_bin-5.1.zip/jtreg/lib/jtreg.jar -XX:StackReservedPages=1 -version ]
        [2020-11-13T19:11:40.898003850Z] Gathering output for process 32117
        StackReservedPages=1 log: [java version "16-ea" 2021-03-16
        Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (fastdebug build 16-ea+25-1586)
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug build 16-ea+25-1586, mixed mode)
        ]
        [2020-11-13T19:11:41.134126825Z] Waiting for completion for process 32117
        [2020-11-13T19:11:41.134535725Z] Waiting for completion finished for process 32117
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        PASSED
        # To suppress the following error report, specify this argument
        # after -XX: or in .hotspotrc: SuppressErrorAt=/frame_aarch64.cpp:326
        #
        # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
        #
        # Internal Error (/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/slaves/47535081-0322-4d83-bb78-f7e11abb86d0-S45708/frameworks/1735e8a2-a1db-478c-8104-60c8b0af87dd-0196/executors/fee1c1bd-3152-42f9-ad8c-fc28266cc5ff/runs/01291963-05c7-4ec1-8b60-6f112a23df10/workspace/open/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/frame_aarch64.cpp:326), pid=32094, tid=32196
        # assert(sp() <= (intptr_t*) result) failed: monitor end should be above the stack pointer
        #
        # JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (16.0+25) (fastdebug build 16-ea+25-1586)
        # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug 16-ea+25-1586, mixed mode, compressed oops, g1 gc, linux-aarch64)
        # Problematic frame:
        # V [libjvm.so+0xb33508] frame::interpreter_frame_monitor_end() const+0x68
        #
        # Core dump will be written. Default location: Core dumps may be processed with "/opt/core.sh %p" (or dumping to /scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/slaves/47535081-0322-4d83-bb78-f7e11abb86d0-S47885/frameworks/1735e8a2-a1db-478c-8104-60c8b0af87dd-0196/executors/2d9383f7-be9a-46ca-bd9e-a682713fb404/runs/711ce683-d382-44e6-9de8-416483e6778b/testoutput/test-support/jtreg_open_test_hotspot_jtreg_hotspot_tier2_runtime/scratch/2/core.32094)
        #
        # An error report file with more information is saved as:
        # /scratch/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/slaves/47535081-0322-4d83-bb78-f7e11abb86d0-S47885/frameworks/1735e8a2-a1db-478c-8104-60c8b0af87dd-0196/executors/2d9383f7-be9a-46ca-bd9e-a682713fb404/runs/711ce683-d382-44e6-9de8-416483e6778b/testoutput/test-support/jtreg_open_test_hotspot_jtreg_hotspot_tier2_runtime/scratch/2/hs_err_pid32094.log
        #
        # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
        # https://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
        #
        ----------System.err:(33/5874)----------
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: Potentially dangerous stack overflow in ReservedStackAccess annotated method java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V [1]
        ----------rerun:(40/7723)*----------


        Here's snippets from the hs_err_pid file:

        # Internal Error (/opt/mach5/mesos/work_dir/slaves/47535081-0322-4d83-bb78-f7e11abb86d0-S45708/frameworks/1735e8a2-a1db-478c-8104-60c8b0af87dd-0196/executors/fee1c1bd-3152-42f9-ad8c-fc28266cc5ff/runs/01291963-05c7-4ec1-8b60-6f112a23df10/workspace/open/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/frame_aarch64.cpp:326), pid=32094, tid=32196
        # assert(sp() <= (intptr_t*) result) failed: monitor end should be above the stack pointer
        #
        # JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (16.0+25) (fastdebug build 16-ea+25-1586)
        # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug 16-ea+25-1586, mixed mode, compressed oops, g1 gc, linux-aarch64)
        # Problematic frame:
        # V [libjvm.so+0xb33508] frame::interpreter_frame_monitor_end() const+0x68

        --------------- T H R E A D ---------------

        Current thread (0x0000ffff84007870): GCTaskThread "GC Thread#2" [stack: 0x0000ffff8c720000,0x0000ffff8c920000] [id=32196]

        Stack: [0x0000ffff8c720000,0x0000ffff8c920000], sp=0x0000ffff8c91d810, free space=2038k
        Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, A=aot compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
        V [libjvm.so+0xb33508] frame::interpreter_frame_monitor_end() const+0x68
        V [libjvm.so+0xb2fecc] frame::oops_interpreted_do(OopClosure*, RegisterMap const*, bool) const+0x2ec
        V [libjvm.so+0x15f96a8] JavaThread::oops_do_frames(OopClosure*, CodeBlobClosure*) [clone .part.0]+0x88
        V [libjvm.so+0x15fc648] Thread::oops_do(OopClosure*, CodeBlobClosure*)+0xc4
        V [libjvm.so+0x1605908] Threads::possibly_parallel_oops_do(bool, OopClosure*, CodeBlobClosure*)+0x1e4
        V [libjvm.so+0xc3fc90] G1RootProcessor::process_java_roots(G1RootClosures*, G1GCPhaseTimes*, unsigned int)+0x80
        V [libjvm.so+0xc405b0] G1RootProcessor::evacuate_roots(G1ParScanThreadState*, unsigned int)+0x70
        V [libjvm.so+0xb81744] G1EvacuateRegionsTask::scan_roots(G1ParScanThreadState*, unsigned int)+0x24
        V [libjvm.so+0xb823b0] G1EvacuateRegionsBaseTask::work(unsigned int)+0x60
        V [libjvm.so+0x1752aa8] GangWorker::run_task(WorkData)+0x98
        V [libjvm.so+0x1752bf4] GangWorker::loop()+0x44
        V [libjvm.so+0x16077c8] Thread::call_run()+0xf8
        V [libjvm.so+0x1337980] thread_native_entry(Thread*)+0x120
        C [libpthread.so.0+0x7d40] start_thread+0xb4

        JavaThread 0x0000ffff540d8ee0 (nid = 32194) was being processed
        Java frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code)
        j java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$Sync.lock()V+12 java.base@16-ea
        j java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.lock()V+4 java.base@16-ea
        j ReservedStackTest$ReentrantLockTest.lockAndCall(I)V+18
        j ReservedStackTest$ReentrantLockTest.lockAndCall(I)V+25
        j ReservedStackTest$ReentrantLockTest.lockAndCall(I)V+25

        <snip a bunch of frame repeats>

        j ReservedStackTest$ReentrantLockTest.lockAndCall(I)V+25
        j ReservedStackTest$ReentrantLockTest.lockAndCall(I)V+25
        j ReservedStackTest$ReentrantLockTest.run()V+2
        J 113 c2 ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall()V (65 bytes) @ 0x0000ffffa5a2c2d8 [0x0000ffffa5a2c240+0x0000000000000098]
        J 113 c2 ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall()V (65 bytes) @ 0x0000ffffa5a2c288 [0x0000ffffa5a2c240+0x0000000000000048]
        J 113 c2 ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall()V (65 bytes) @ 0x0000ffffa5a2c288 [0x0000ffffa5a2c240+0x0000000000000048]
        J 113 c2 ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall()V (65 bytes) @ 0x0000ffffa5a2c288 [0x0000ffffa5a2c240+0x0000000000000048]

        <snip thousands? of frame repeats>

        J 113 c2 ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall()V (65 bytes) @ 0x0000ffffa5a2c288 [0x0000ffffa5a2c240+0x0000000000000048]
        J 113 c2 ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall()V (65 bytes) @ 0x0000ffffa5a2c288 [0x0000ffffa5a2c240+0x0000000000000048]
        J 113 c2 ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall()V (65 bytes) @ 0x0000ffffa5a2c288 [0x0000ffffa5a2c240+0x0000000000000048]
        J 113 c2 ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall()V (65 bytes) @ 0x0000ffffa5a2c288 [0x0000ffffa5a2c240+0x0000000000000048]
        J 113 c2 ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall()V (65 bytes) @ 0x0000ffffa5a2c288 [0x0000ffffa5a2c240+0x0000000000000048]
        J 113 c2 ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.recursiveCall()V (65 bytes) @ 0x0000ffffa5a2c288 [0x0000ffffa5a2c240+0x0000000000000048]
        j ReservedStackTest$RunWithSOEContext.run()V+21
        j java.lang.Thread.run()V+11 java.base@16-ea
        v ~StubRoutines::call_stub


        Starting this bug at P3 since this is a Tier2 test failure and
        starting in hotspot/runtime since this is a Runtime test.
        The failing build-ID, jdk-16+25-1586-tier2, only contains
        test fixes in an unrelated area so I'm labeling this failure
        as intermittent.

          Attachments

            Issue Links

              Activity

                People

                Assignee:
                aph Andrew Haley
                Reporter:
                dcubed Daniel Daugherty
                Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                11 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: